Industry Insights

IoT-Native vs Bolt-On CMMS: Why Integration Architecture Matters

Compare IoT integration approaches for CMMS. Learn why native sensor support outperforms add-on solutions for predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring.

D

David Miller

Technical Writer

November 19, 2024 9 min read
IoT sensor connected to industrial equipment with CMMS dashboard showing real-time data

Key Takeaways

  • IoT-native CMMS processes sensor data directly—no middleware required, faster response to anomalies
  • Bolt-on integrations add complexity: multiple vendors, data translation layers, and potential failure points
  • Native architecture enables automatic work order generation within seconds of threshold breach
  • Consider total cost: bolt-on may have lower upfront cost but higher ongoing integration maintenance

Every CMMS vendor now claims “IoT integration.” But there’s a fundamental difference between platforms built from the ground up for sensor data and those bolting on IoT as an afterthought.

This difference affects everything: how fast you detect problems, how reliably data flows, and how much you’ll spend keeping integrations working.

Here’s how to evaluate IoT architecture when choosing CMMS.

Two Approaches to IoT Integration

IoT-Native Architecture

Definition: The CMMS is designed from its foundation to receive, process, and act on sensor data. IoT isn’t a feature—it’s part of the core platform.

Characteristics:

  • Sensor protocols (MQTT, HTTP, LoRaWAN) built into the platform
  • Real-time data processing engine native to the system
  • Automatic work order generation as core functionality
  • Unified data model for assets and sensor readings
  • Single vendor for platform and IoT support

Bolt-On Integration Architecture

Definition: The CMMS connects to IoT capabilities through external platforms, middleware, or third-party integrations.

Characteristics:

  • Requires separate IoT platform or gateway
  • Data passes through translation layers
  • Work order triggers configured through API connections
  • Asset data and sensor data may live in separate systems
  • Multiple vendors involved in the full solution

Architecture Comparison

AspectIoT-NativeBolt-On
Data flowDirect: Sensor → CMMSIndirect: Sensor → Gateway → API → CMMS
Response timeMilliseconds to secondsSeconds to minutes
Failure pointsFewerMultiple (each integration layer)
Setup complexityLowerHigher
Vendor supportSingle vendorMultiple vendors
CustomizationMay be more limitedMore flexible
Cost structureBundledSeparate licensing

How IoT-Native Works

According to eWorkOrders’ IoT integration guide, an IoT-enabled CMMS requires four essential components working together:

1. Sensor Data Ingestion

IoT-native platforms support common sensor protocols directly:

ProtocolUse CaseAdvantage
MQTTMost IoT sensorsLightweight, low bandwidth
HTTP/RESTWeb-based sensorsFamiliar, widely supported
LoRaWANLong-range, low-powerCampus-scale coverage
NB-IoTCellular IoTNo local network needed

According to MicroMain’s IoT sensor guide:

Your sensors need to be able to share their data with your CMMS. That means looking for sensors supporting proper protocols, like MQTT, HTTP, or REST APIs. If your sensor can’t send its data directly to the CMMS, you’ll have to manually transfer information or build workarounds.

2. Real-Time Processing

The CMMS processes incoming sensor data immediately:

  • Compare readings against thresholds
  • Identify anomalies and patterns
  • Trigger alerts when conditions met
  • Store historical data for analysis

In native architecture, this processing happens within the CMMS—no external analytics platform required.

3. Automatic Work Order Generation

According to DreamzCMMS research:

When a sensor detects a deviation from defined thresholds, the CMMS automatically generates work orders, alerts technicians, or even triggers remote system adjustments.

Example flow:

  1. Vibration sensor detects reading above threshold (0.8 in/s)
  2. CMMS receives reading via MQTT
  3. System compares against configured limit (0.5 in/s)
  4. Work order auto-generates: “Investigate elevated vibration on Pump-03”
  5. Technician receives mobile notification
  6. Sensor data attached to work order for context

In IoT-native systems, this happens in seconds. In bolt-on systems, data may pass through multiple platforms first.

4. Unified Asset-Sensor Model

IoT-native platforms maintain a single data model where:

  • Each asset has associated sensors
  • Sensor readings link to asset history
  • Maintenance records include sensor context
  • Analytics span both operational and maintenance data

Bolt-on integrations often struggle to maintain this unified view, requiring manual correlation between systems.

How Bolt-On Integration Works

Traditional CMMS platforms add IoT through integration layers:

Typical Bolt-On Architecture

[Sensors] → [IoT Gateway Platform] → [API/Middleware] → [CMMS]

           [Separate Analytics]

Components required:

ComponentPurposeAdditional Cost
IoT PlatformCollect and manage sensor data$500-5,000/month
API MiddlewareTranslate data formatsMay be included or $500+/month
Custom IntegrationConnect systems$5,000-50,000 development
Analytics PlatformProcess sensor data$500-3,000/month

Integration Complexity

According to ClickMaint’s IoT integration guide:

Most modern CMMS platforms are designed to be sensor-agnostic. They can integrate with various IoT data sources through an open API or a central IoT gateway platform.

This flexibility comes with complexity. According to eWorkOrders’ integration comparison:

A more complex project, like a custom CMMS integration with SAP ERP involving multiple modules and significant data mapping, can take several months to fully implement.

Comparing Implementation Timelines

IoT-Native Implementation

PhaseTimelineActivities
Platform setupWeek 1-2Configure CMMS, set up assets
Sensor deploymentWeek 2-4Install sensors, connect to platform
Threshold configurationWeek 4-5Set alert parameters, test triggers
Go-liveWeek 5-6Activate automatic work orders
Total5-6 weeks

Bolt-On Implementation

PhaseTimelineActivities
CMMS setupWeek 1-4Configure base CMMS
IoT platform setupWeek 2-6Separate IoT platform deployment
Sensor deploymentWeek 4-8Install sensors, connect to IoT platform
Integration developmentWeek 6-12Build API connections, data mapping
TestingWeek 10-14End-to-end testing, troubleshooting
Go-liveWeek 14-16Activate with close monitoring
Total14-16+ weeks

Start Free Trial

Experience the full platform with 30-day free access. No credit card required.

Start Free Trial

Book a Demo

Get a personalized walkthrough from our team. See how Infodeck fits your operation.

Schedule Demo

Total Cost of Ownership

5-Year TCO Comparison (50-asset facility)

IoT-Native Solution:

Cost ComponentYear 1Years 2-5 (each)
CMMS subscription (10 users)$12,000$12,000
IoT module (included or small premium)$3,000$2,000
Sensors (50 × $150)$7,500$1,500 (replacements)
Implementation$5,000
Year Total$27,500$15,500
5-Year Total$89,500

Bolt-On Solution:

Cost ComponentYear 1Years 2-5 (each)
CMMS subscription (10 users)$10,000$10,000
IoT platform subscription$6,000$6,000
Middleware/API platform$3,000$3,000
Sensors (50 × $150)$7,500$1,500
Integration development$25,000
Integration maintenance$2,000$5,000
Year Total$53,500$25,500
5-Year Total$155,500

Difference: $66,000 over 5 years

The bolt-on solution’s lower CMMS subscription is overwhelmed by integration costs.

When Bolt-On Makes Sense

Despite complexity, bolt-on integration may be appropriate when:

1. Existing Investment

You already have a CMMS you can’t replace and an IoT platform in place. Integration leverages existing investments.

2. Specialized Sensors

Your equipment requires specialized sensors with proprietary protocols that only work with specific IoT platforms.

3. Enterprise Data Lake Strategy

Your organization centralizes all IoT data in a corporate data lake that feeds multiple systems including CMMS.

4. Unique Requirements

Your workflow requires custom data transformations that standard IoT-native platforms don’t support.

Evaluating IoT-Native Platforms

Questions to Ask Vendors

Architecture:

  • Is IoT functionality built-in or through integration?
  • What sensor protocols do you support natively?
  • Where does sensor data processing occur?
  • Can I see the data flow diagram?

Functionality:

  • How quickly do alerts generate work orders?
  • Can I configure custom threshold rules?
  • Do work orders include sensor data context?
  • How do I view historical sensor trends?

Scalability:

  • How many sensors can the platform handle?
  • What happens as sensor volume grows?
  • Are there additional fees for sensor data volume?
  • Can I add sensors without additional integration work?

Support:

  • Who supports sensor connectivity issues?
  • Is there a single point of contact for the full solution?
  • What sensor brands are certified compatible?
  • What’s the SLA for data processing?

Red Flags

  • “We integrate with any IoT platform” (translation: we don’t have native IoT)
  • Vague data flow explanations
  • Multiple vendors required for support
  • Sensor setup requires external consultants
  • Separate licensing for “IoT module”

Infodeck’s IoT Approach

Infodeck is built IoT-native. Sensor data flows directly into the platform:

Native capabilities:

  • MQTT and HTTP sensor protocol support
  • Real-time threshold monitoring
  • Automatic work order generation
  • Unified asset-sensor data model
  • Single platform, single vendor

Practical benefits:

  • Sensors connect directly—no middleware
  • Alerts trigger work orders in seconds
  • Complete maintenance history includes sensor context
  • One support contact for all issues

Making Your Decision

Choose IoT-Native If:

  • ✅ You’re implementing CMMS and IoT together
  • ✅ You want simplicity and fast deployment
  • ✅ You prefer single-vendor accountability
  • ✅ You don’t have existing IoT infrastructure
  • ✅ Long-term TCO matters more than initial cost

Choose Bolt-On If:

  • ✅ You have significant existing CMMS investment
  • ✅ You already have a mature IoT platform
  • ✅ You have specialized integration requirements
  • ✅ Your enterprise architecture mandates specific platforms
  • ✅ You have internal integration expertise

Key Evaluation Metrics

MetricWhat to Measure
Time to first alertHow long from sensor install to first automatic work order?
Data latencyWhat’s the delay from sensor reading to CMMS visibility?
Implementation timelineHow long until you’re fully operational?
Integration maintenanceHow much ongoing effort to keep integrations working?
Vendor complexityHow many companies do you rely on for the full solution?

Ready to see IoT-native CMMS in action? Explore Infodeck’s IoT sensor integration—built-in from day one, not bolted on as an afterthought. Book a demo to see how quickly you can connect sensors to automated maintenance workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is IoT-native CMMS?
IoT-native CMMS is built from the ground up to ingest and process sensor data directly. The platform includes sensor connectivity, data processing, threshold management, and automatic work order generation as core features—not add-on modules. This contrasts with bolt-on solutions where IoT capability is added through third-party integrations.
What's the difference between native and bolt-on IoT integration?
Native integration means IoT functionality is built into the CMMS architecture. Bolt-on integration uses external platforms, APIs, or middleware to connect sensors to CMMS. Native offers faster data processing, simpler architecture, and unified vendor support. Bolt-on offers flexibility but adds complexity and potential failure points.
What communication protocols should CMMS support for IoT?
Look for CMMS supporting MQTT (lightweight, ideal for sensors), HTTP/REST APIs (standard web protocols), and potentially LoRaWAN or NB-IoT for long-range, low-power sensors. The system should also support common IoT gateways if you have diverse sensor types.
Can I add IoT to my existing CMMS?
Most modern CMMS platforms support IoT integration through APIs or third-party platforms. However, integration complexity varies widely. Consider: Does your CMMS have documented sensor support? What middleware is required? Who supports the integration? Native IoT platforms eliminate these questions.
Is IoT-native CMMS more expensive?
Upfront costs may be similar or slightly higher. However, native solutions typically have lower total cost of ownership due to eliminated middleware licensing, reduced integration maintenance, single vendor support, and faster implementation. Calculate 3-5 year TCO including all integration costs.
Tags: IoT CMMS integration predictive maintenance sensor integration smart maintenance
D

Written by

David Miller

Technical Writer

View all posts

Ready to Transform Your Maintenance Operations?

Join facilities teams achieving 75% less unplanned downtime. Start your free trial today.