Objective 2026 Comparison

Infodeck vs eMaint

Continuous IoT monitoring meets reliability-centered maintenance. Compare two approaches to predictive maintenance.

Last updated: February 2026

Fluke ecosystem only
Start same day - it's SaaS
Periodic testing
Continuous 24/7 monitoring
Higher pricing
Open IoT protocols
ISO 27001:2022
SOC 2 Type II
30-day free trial

Quick Decision Guide

Based on your needs, here is which platform may be the better fit.

Infodeck may be the better fit if you...

  • Want to start today - add locations, assets, and go
  • You want continuous 24/7 sensor monitoring
  • You need open IoT protocols (LoRaWAN, AWS IoT)
  • You manage smart buildings with HVAC, energy, environment sensors
  • You need public request forms via QR codes
  • You prefer vendor-agnostic sensor options
e

eMaint may be the better fit if you...

  • You're already invested in Fluke equipment
  • Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) is your methodology
  • You need deep MTTR/MTBF analysis and failure tracking
  • Electrical maintenance and testing is a primary focus
  • You prefer periodic professional-grade testing over continuous monitoring
Quick Comparison

See the difference at a glance

Key metrics that matter when choosing your CMMS platform

Time to Start
Infodeck Infodeck
Same day
e
eMaint
2-4 weeks

Implementation complexity

Starting Price
Infodeck Infodeck
From $17/mo
e
eMaint
$69/user/mo

Per user pricing

Free Trial
Infodeck Infodeck
30 days
e
eMaint
Demo only

Self-serve available

IoT Integration
Infodeck Infodeck
Open protocols
e
eMaint
Fluke only

Sensor connectivity

Monitoring
Infodeck Infodeck
Continuous 24/7
e
eMaint
Periodic testing

Data collection approach

Industry Fit
Infodeck Infodeck
All verticals
e
eMaint
Reliability-focused

RCM methodology

Two Different Approaches

Continuous real-time monitoring vs periodic professional testing. Which philosophy fits your needs?

Infodeck: Continuous Monitoring

  • Sensors report data 24/7 automatically
  • Instant alerts when thresholds are breached
  • Historical trend analysis and predictions
  • Works with any LoRaWAN or IoT sensor

eMaint: Periodic Testing

  • Technicians take scheduled measurements
  • Fluke device data uploads to CMMS
  • Professional-grade Fluke testing tools
  • Strong for electrical and reliability testing

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Detailed breakdown of capabilities across both platforms.

Feature
Infodeck
eMaint

Work Order Management

Multi-channel intake (web, mobile, QR, email)
Smart auto-assignment
Offline mobile support
SLA tracking & alerts
Auto-create from sensor data
Limited
Condition-based triggers
Periodic only

Asset Management

Asset hierarchy
QR/barcode scanning
Maintenance history
Spare parts linking
Real-time sensor data
Limited
Failure tracking & RCM
Strong

IoT & Sensors

Native IoT support
Limited
LoRaWAN integration
7 LNS providers
AWS IoT integration
Fluke Connect integration
Continuous monitoring
Periodic
Open sensor protocols
Fluke only

Reliability Features

MTTR/MTBF tracking
Strong
Root cause analysis
Strong
Failure mode tracking
Strong
RCM workflows
Basic
Strong
Predictive maintenance
Sensor-based
Historical

Reporting & Analytics

Pre-built dashboards
Custom reports
Real-time sensor charts
Limited
Reliability reports
Strong
Export to Excel/PDF

Pricing & Support

Starting price
From $17/user/mo
$69/user/mo
Free trial
30 days
Demo only
Implementation support
Included
Extra cost
Public request forms (QR code)
Multilingual support
EN, CN, TH
English primarily

Honest Assessment

Every platform has strengths and limitations. Here is an objective look at both.

Infodeck

Strengths

  • Native IoT with open protocols (LoRaWAN, AWS IoT)
  • Continuous real-time sensor monitoring
  • Data quality management for sensor validation
  • Start same day - no lengthy implementation
  • Public request forms via QR codes for easy work order intake
  • Works with any sensor, not locked to one vendor

Limitations

  • No native Fluke Connect integration
  • RCM features less mature than eMaint
  • Newer platform vs established eMaint
e

eMaint

Strengths

  • Backed by Fluke Corporation - strong reliability heritage
  • Native Fluke Connect device integration
  • Deep reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) features
  • Strong MTTR/MTBF tracking and analysis
  • Professional-grade electrical testing integration

Limitations

  • Limited to Fluke ecosystem for IoT integration
  • Periodic testing vs continuous monitoring
  • No LoRaWAN or open IoT protocol support
  • No public request forms for external users
  • Higher pricing for full feature set

Considering a switch?

If you're evaluating a move from any CMMS platform, our team provides complimentary migration planning.

Free data migration assessment
Historical data import at no extra charge
Parallel running support during transition
Team training and onboarding included

Frequently Asked

Still have questions?